What flight control is used for FPV aircraft? Recommendations and comparisons of popular flight controls in 2024
As FPV (First Person View) flight has continued to become a hot topic in the past 10 days, especially with the rise of drone racing and aerial photography, the choice of flight control (flight controller) has become the focus of players' attention. This article will combine the latest hot spots on the Internet, analyze the current mainstream FPV aircraft flight controls, and provide structured data comparison to help players quickly find the equipment that suits them.
1. Hot topics in FPV field in the past 10 days
According to the popularity of discussions on social media and forums, the following topics have attracted much attention recently:
| hot topics | focus of discussion |
|---|---|
| Popularization of digital image transmission | DJI O3 Air Unit and HDZero compatibility controversy |
| Flight controller firmware update | Betaflight 4.5 new features tested |
| Lightweight trend | Reliability test of micro flight control below 20g |
| The rise of domestic flight control | Cost-effectiveness comparison between SpeedyBee F405 V3 and overseas brands |
2. Core functional requirements for FPV aircraft flight control
FPV flight control needs to meet the following core requirements:
1.Stability: Gyroscope anti-interference ability in high-frequency vibration environment.
2.Compatibility: Supports mainstream digital/analog image transmission protocols (such as DJI, Walksnail).
3.Scalability: Can be connected to peripherals such as GPS, LED light strips, etc.
4.Lightweight: Racing models require flight control weight ≤15g.
3. Horizontal comparison of mainstream FPV flight controls in 2024
| Model | Main control chip | weight | Features | Applicable scenarios | Price (yuan) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpeedyBee F405 V3 | STM32F405 | 9g | Integrated Bluetooth debugging, supports 4S battery | Racing/Flower Flying | 280-350 |
| Mamba F722 Mini | STM32F722 | 7.5g | Dual gyroscope redundant design | professional racing | 420-500 |
| HGLRC Zeus F7 | STM32F745 | 12g | Support 8K PID refresh rate | High-end aerial photography | 600-700 |
| iFlight SucceX-E F4 | STM32F411 | 6.8g | Ultra-thin design, economical | Getting started | 180-250 |
4. Suggestions for flight control selection
1.racing player: Give priority to Mamba F722 Mini, whose dual-gyro design can handle extreme maneuvers.
2.Aerial photography users: The high-performance main control of HGLRC Zeus F7 is suitable for mounting gimbal equipment.
3.Limited budget: iFlight SucceX-E F4 is a cost-effective choice, but please note that it only supports analog image transmission.
4.Firmware Ecosystem: Betaflight is still the mainstream, but some domestic flight controllers have been adapted to the simpler EMUflight.
5. Forecast of future trends
According to recent developments in the developer community, the following technologies may become the highlights of the next generation of flight control:
| Technical direction | progress | Estimated application time |
|---|---|---|
| AI posture prediction | Betaflight lab testing phase | 2024 Q4 |
| Millimeter wave radar obstacle avoidance | Display of prototypes from some manufacturers | 2025 |
| Low power consumption LoRa data transmission | The open source community already has adaptation solutions | 2024 Q3 |
Summary: The choice of FPV flight control requires comprehensive performance, weight and budget. It is recommended that players refer to the data in this article based on actual flight scenarios and continue to pay attention to firmware updates for the best experience.
check the details
check the details
en
